1. Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R), using codes given below, select the correct answer.
Assertion (A) : Termination of service does not amount to retrenchment.
Reason (R) : Amount of loss of retrenchment is more than amount of termination.
Codes :
- (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is correct explanation of (A).
- (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not correct explanation of (A).
- (A) is true, but (R) is false.
- (A) is false, but (R) is true
2. Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and with help of codes given below, point out the correct explanation.
Assertion (A): An agreement not enforceable by law is said to be void.
Reason (R): Law has no force.
Codes:
- Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is good explanation of (A).
- Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not correct explanation of (A).
- (A) is true, but (R) is false.
- (A) is false, but (R) is true.
3.
Ans: Option D
4.
Ans: Option b
5. Liability in torts depends on
- Quantum of damages suffered
- Involvement of intention
- Infringement of legal right
- Effect of public interest
6. Read Assertion I and Reason II and with the help of codes given below find out the correct explanation.
Assertion I: Disorder of mind which impairs the mental faculties is known as unsoundness of mind as such it acts as defence to a criminal charge.
Reason II: Insanity is the mental abnormality and when it impairs the cognitive faculty and if an act results during that period criminal liability could be exempted.
Codes:
Assertion I: Disorder of mind which impairs the mental faculties is known as unsoundness of mind as such it acts as defence to a criminal charge.
Reason II: Insanity is the mental abnormality and when it impairs the cognitive faculty and if an act results during that period criminal liability could be exempted.
Codes:
- By I there is transgression of harmful acts while II refers to established rules of society for which no prosecution stands.
- Both I and II are correct explanations as per Section 84 of IPC.
- II is more precise while I is only a supportive factor.
- The true test of I and II is to apply Mcnaughton’s Rule.
7. The statement "There is no distinction between Public and Private law" is attributed to
- Comte
- Spencer
- Duguit
- Ehrlich
8. In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court directed closing down and demolition of shrimp industries in coastal regulation zone and implement the “precautionary principle” and “the polluter pays principle and held them liable for payment of compensation for reversing the ecology and compensate the individual for loss suffered?
- S. Jagannath Vs. Union of India.
- Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum Vs. Union of India.
- M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India.
- Church of God (Full Gospels) in India Vs. KKR Majestic Colony Welfare Association.
9. Which of the following is an essential constituent of negligence?
(1) Defendant was under or legal duty to exercise due care
(2) This duty was owed to plaintiff
(3) Defendant committed breach of such duty
(4) That the breach of such duty was the direct and proximate cause of the damage alleged.
Codes:
- 1, 2 and 3
- 1, 2, 3 and 4
- 2, 3 and 4
- 1, 2 and 4
10. Marriages of all persons who are citizens of India belonging to various religions should be made compulsory registrable in their respective States where the marriage is solemnised. This was held by the Supreme Court in the case of:
- Githa Hariharn vs. RBI
- Seema vs. Ashwani Kumar
- John Vallamathom vs. Union of India
- None of the above
