LAW NOTES

1. In which case the Supreme Court of India held that right to access to drinking water is fundamental to life and it is the duty of the State under Act 21 to provide clean drinking water to its citizens ?
    Ans: A.P. Pollution Control Board vs M.V. Nayudu 

2.Match List-I (name of case) with List-II (name of writ) and give correct answer by using code given below:
List I
a. Sunil Batra vs Delhi Administration
b. U.N. R. Rao vs Smt. Indira Gandhi
c. Gujarat State Financial Corporation vs Lotus Hotels
d. Nalini Ranjan vs Annada Shankar

List II 
(i) Quo Warranto 
(ii) Habeas Corpus
(iii) Certiorari
(iv) Mandamus 

Codes:
         a     b        c        d
  • (i)    (ii)   (iii)    (iv)
  • (ii)  (i)   (iv)  (iii)
3.Match List-I with List-II and give correct answer by using code given below:

     List I
     (Provision for)
a. Punishment for causing death or resulting in persistent vegetative state of victim
b. Sexual intercourse by husband upon his wife during separation
c. Sexual intercourse by a person in authority
d. Gang Rape

List II
(Sections of I.P.C)
i. Section 376-D
ii. Section 376-B
iii. Section 376-A
iv. Section 376-C

Code:
        a         b        c         d
  • iii       ii       iv       i
  • ii         iii       i          iv

Some important case laws:
 1. The principle of legality
    Commonwealth v. Mochan 
    Keeler v. Superior Court 

2. Burden of proof
       Owens v. State

3. Actus reus
       Martin v. State

4. Voluntary act
      State v. Utter 
      People v. Decina

5. Omission
    People v. Beardsley 
    Barber v. Superior Court

6.  Mens rea
     Regina v. Cunningham
     People v. Conley

 7. Mistake of fact
      People v. Navarro
      Regina v. Prince

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

MODEL NOTES FOR JUDICIAL EXAM - 103

1. A Judicial Magistrate dismissed a private complaint u/s 203 CrPC. The aggrieved complainant approached the Chief Judicial Magistrate for ...