1. A is charged with cheating B, and the manner in which he cheated B is not set out in the charge. There were many transactions between A and B, and A had no means of knowing to which of them the charge referred, and offered no defence. The Court may inter from such facts
A. that the omission to set out the manner of the cheating was, in the case, a material error.
B. that the omission to set out the manner of the cheating wasn't, in the case, a material error.
2. An admission may be proved by or on behalf of the person making it, when it consists of a statement of the existence of any state of mind of body, relevant or in issue, made at or about the time when such state of mind or body existed, and is accompanied by conduct rendering its falsehood
A. improbable
B. probable
3. A, the Captain of a ship, is tried for casting her away. Evidence is given to show that the ship was taken out of her proper course. A produces a book kept by him in the ordinary course of his business showing observations alleged to have been taken by him from day to day, and indicating that the ship was not taken out of her proper course, A may prove these statements, because they would be admissible between third parties, if he were dead, under section 32, clause (2) of the Indian Evidence Act. To which section of the Indian Evidence Act does the illustration belong?
Ans: Sec. 21 of the Indian Evidence Act
4. Quid Pro quo means
A. Something for nothing
B. something for something
5. The case K. N. Mehra v State of Rajasthan is related to
A. Theft
B. Murder
6. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with
A. imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both
B. imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both
7. Whoever, being a clerk or servant, or being employed in the capacity of a clerk or servant, commits theft in respect of any property in the possession of his master or employer, shall be punished with
A. imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine
B. imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine
8. A commits theft on property in Z's possession and while committing this theft, he has a loaded pistol under his garment, having provided this pistol for the purpose of hurting Z in case Z should resist. A has committed the offence under
A. Sec. 382 of IPC
B. Sec. 381 of IPC
9. A threatens to send club-men to plough up Z's field unless Z will sign and deliver to B a bond binding Z under a penalty to deliver certain produce to B, and thereby induces Z to sign and deliver the bond. A has committed
A. extortion
B. theft
10. Whoever commits extortion shall be punished with
A. imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both
B. imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both
2. An admission may be proved by or on behalf of the person making it, when it consists of a statement of the existence of any state of mind of body, relevant or in issue, made at or about the time when such state of mind or body existed, and is accompanied by conduct rendering its falsehood
A. improbable
B. probable
3. A, the Captain of a ship, is tried for casting her away. Evidence is given to show that the ship was taken out of her proper course. A produces a book kept by him in the ordinary course of his business showing observations alleged to have been taken by him from day to day, and indicating that the ship was not taken out of her proper course, A may prove these statements, because they would be admissible between third parties, if he were dead, under section 32, clause (2) of the Indian Evidence Act. To which section of the Indian Evidence Act does the illustration belong?
Ans: Sec. 21 of the Indian Evidence Act
4. Quid Pro quo means
A. Something for nothing
B. something for something
5. The case K. N. Mehra v State of Rajasthan is related to
A. Theft
B. Murder
6. Whoever commits theft shall be punished with
A. imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both
B. imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both
7. Whoever, being a clerk or servant, or being employed in the capacity of a clerk or servant, commits theft in respect of any property in the possession of his master or employer, shall be punished with
A. imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine
B. imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine
8. A commits theft on property in Z's possession and while committing this theft, he has a loaded pistol under his garment, having provided this pistol for the purpose of hurting Z in case Z should resist. A has committed the offence under
A. Sec. 382 of IPC
B. Sec. 381 of IPC
9. A threatens to send club-men to plough up Z's field unless Z will sign and deliver to B a bond binding Z under a penalty to deliver certain produce to B, and thereby induces Z to sign and deliver the bond. A has committed
A. extortion
B. theft
10. Whoever commits extortion shall be punished with
A. imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both
B. imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.